1995 Ford Aerostar vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1995 Ford Aerostar. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 172 kg more than 1995 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Aerostar | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Aerostar | LS |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 298 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2910 mm |