1995 Ford Aerostar vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1995 Ford Aerostar. (134 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 105 kg more than 1995 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Aerostar | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Aerostar | Colt |
Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2970 mm |