1995 Ford Aerostar vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Aerostar (134 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Because 1995 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Aerostar | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Aerostar | Cube |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2640 mm |
