1995 Ford Contour vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Contour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Contour would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1995 Ford Contour. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Contour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Contour weights approximately 564 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Because 1998 Lotus Emme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lotus Emme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Contour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Contour. (180 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Contour.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Contour | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Contour | Emme |
Year Released | 1995 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 260 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 354 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 678 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2770 mm |