1995 Ford Explorer vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1995 Ford Explorer is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 3,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Explorer (160 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Explorer weights approximately 830 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Explorer (311 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (118 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Explorer | 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Explorer | Sigma |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2520 mm |