1995 Ford Fairlane vs. 1964 Seat 1500
To start off, 1995 Ford Fairlane is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Fairlane (206 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 420 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Fairlane | 1964 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Fairlane | 1500 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2660 mm |