1995 Ford Fairlane vs. 2008 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 516 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1995 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Fairlane (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Fairlane | 2008 Mazda Etude | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fairlane | Etude |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 357 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 83.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1064 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2620 mm |