1995 Ford Falcon vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1995 Ford Falcon is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,705 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Falcon (228 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Falcon weights approximately 638 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Falcon (398 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Falcon | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1995 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3705 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 398 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2210 mm |