1995 Ford Falcon vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 1995 Ford Falcon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,705 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Falcon (228 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Falcon weights approximately 430 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Falcon (398 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Falcon | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | 929 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3705 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 398 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2620 mm |