1995 Ford Falcon vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,705 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Falcon (228 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (187 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 140 kg more than 1995 Ford Falcon.

Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Falcon (398 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Tundra.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Ford Falcon 2000 Toyota Tundra
Make Ford Toyota
Model Falcon Tundra
Year Released 1995 2000
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3705 cc 3400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 228 HP 187 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 398 Nm 298 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1580 kg 1720 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 5530 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1920 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 3270 mm