1995 Ford Galaxy vs. 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 1995 Ford Galaxy is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 429 kg more than 1995 Ford Galaxy.
Because 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Galaxy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Galaxy | 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Galaxy | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1961 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1679 kg | 2108 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3070 mm |
