1995 Ford Galaxy vs. 1964 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 1995 Ford Galaxy is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Reliant Scimitar (120 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1995 Ford Galaxy. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Reliant Scimitar should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Galaxy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Galaxy weights approximately 676 kg more than 1964 Reliant Scimitar.
Because 1964 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Galaxy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Reliant Scimitar (190 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Galaxy. (172 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1964 Reliant Scimitar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Galaxy.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Galaxy | 1964 Reliant Scimitar | |
Make | Ford | Reliant |
Model | Galaxy | Scimitar |
Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1679 kg | 1003 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2340 mm |