1995 Ford Mustang vs. 1953 Holden FX
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Mustang (212 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 500 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Mustang | 1953 Holden FX | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Mustang | FX |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 51 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |
