1995 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 908 kg more than 1963 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Mustang | 1963 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Mustang | 600 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4947 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 19 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 40 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |