1995 Ford Mustang vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 37 kg more than 1995 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Mustang | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Mustang | 240 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4947 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Torque | 386 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2740 mm |
