1995 Ford Mustang vs. 1969 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 573 kg more than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1995 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Mustang | 1969 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mustang | Colt |
Year Released | 1995 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4947 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 120 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2360 mm |