1995 Ford Mustang vs. 1973 Seat 127
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Seat 127 would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 778 kg more than 1973 Seat 127.
Because 1995 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Seat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Seat 127. (64 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Mustang | 1973 Seat 127 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Mustang | 127 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4947 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 64 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2230 mm |