1995 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Renault 18
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 18 would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 498 kg more than 1982 Renault 18.
Because 1995 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 18. (103 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Mustang | 1982 Renault 18 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | 18 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4947 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 103 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2450 mm |