1995 Ford Mustang vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Mustang | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | Ranger |
Year Released | 1995 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4947 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4690 mm |