1995 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 843 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 1992 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. (43 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Mustang | 1992 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mustang | Minica |
Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4947 cc | 548 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 30 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 43 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2270 mm |