1995 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 1996 Lancia Zeta is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 132 kg more than 1995 Ford Mustang.
Because 1995 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lancia Zeta. (260 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Mustang | 1996 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Mustang | Zeta |
Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4947 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |