1995 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Mustang | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4947 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 460 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2580 mm |