1995 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 317 kg more than 1995 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 457 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Mustang. (386 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Mustang | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Mustang | XKA |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4947 cc | 4399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 466 HP |
| Torque | 386 Nm | 843 Nm |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 299 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2590 mm |
