1995 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2000 Toyota Opa is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 213 kg more than 2000 Toyota Opa.
Because 1995 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Opa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Opa. (200 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Opa.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Mustang | 2000 Toyota Opa | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Opa |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4947 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |