1995 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd

To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (120 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 207 kg more than 2010 Kia Cee'd. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1995 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Ford Mustang 2010 Kia Cee'd
Make Ford Kia
Model Mustang Cee'd
Year Released 1995 2010
Body Type Convertible Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 1591 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 212 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1470 kg 1263 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4240 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2660 mm