1995 Ford Probe vs. 1942 Simca 5
To start off, 1995 Ford Probe is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Probe (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1942 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe should accelerate faster than 1942 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Probe weights approximately 670 kg more than 1942 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Probe | 1942 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Probe | 5 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1942 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1350 mm |
