1995 Ford Probe vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1995 Ford Probe is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Probe weights approximately 965 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Probe (218 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Probe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Probe | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Probe | R 360 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1960 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 16 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 22 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.2 mm | 63 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |