1995 Ford Probe vs. 1962 Mitsubishi A10
To start off, 1995 Ford Probe is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mitsubishi A10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mitsubishi A10 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Probe weights approximately 870 kg more than 1962 Mitsubishi A10.
Because 1962 Mitsubishi A10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Mitsubishi A10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Probe (218 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mitsubishi A10. (34 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Probe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mitsubishi A10.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Probe | 1962 Mitsubishi A10 | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Probe | A10 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 20 HP |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 34 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2070 mm |
