1995 Ford Probe vs. 1964 Opel Kadett
To start off, 1995 Ford Probe is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Opel Kadett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Opel Kadett would be higher. At 2,507 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Probe weights approximately 645 kg more than 1964 Opel Kadett.
Because 1964 Opel Kadett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Opel Kadett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Probe (218 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Opel Kadett. (70 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Probe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Opel Kadett.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Probe | 1964 Opel Kadett | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Probe | Kadett |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 70 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.2 mm | 61 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2330 mm |
