1995 Ford Probe vs. 1966 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1995 Ford Probe is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Probe weights approximately 601 kg more than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Because 1966 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Probe (218 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Probe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Probe | 1966 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | Probe | 966 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 52 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.2 mm | 54.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2170 mm |