1995 Ford Probe vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1995 Ford Probe is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Probe weights approximately 55 kg more than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (246 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Probe. (218 Nm). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Probe.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Probe | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Probe | Belmont |
Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 3043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 246 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2830 mm |