1995 Ford Probe vs. 1968 Mazda R-100
To start off, 1995 Ford Probe is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Probe (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1968 Mazda R-100. (110 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda R-100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Probe weights approximately 425 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Probe (172 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Probe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Probe | 1968 Mazda R-100 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Probe | R-100 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1963 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1350 mm |
