1995 Ford Probe vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1995 Ford Probe is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Probe weights approximately 385 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Probe (218 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Probe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Probe | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Probe | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |
