1995 Ford Probe vs. 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro
To start off, 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Probe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Probe would be higher. At 4,942 cc, 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro weights approximately 305 kg more than 1995 Ford Probe.
Because 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro (900 Nm) has 682 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Probe. (218 Nm). This means 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Probe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Probe | 1997 Lotec Testa de Oro | |
| Make | Ford | Lotec |
| Model | Probe | Testa de Oro |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 4942 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 741 HP |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 900 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.2 mm | 78 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1650 kg |
