1995 Ford Probe vs. 2006 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Probe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Probe would be higher. At 2,507 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mazda DrifterX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda DrifterX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Probe. (218 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Probe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Probe | 2006 Mazda DrifterX | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Probe | DrifterX |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 257 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |
