1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1949 Riley RM A
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 193 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Ranger | 1949 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Ford | Riley |
| Model | Ranger | RM A |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2870 mm |
