1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1959 Seat 600
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 853 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 1959 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Ranger | 600 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2010 mm |