1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 648 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | Herald |
Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2320 mm |