1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 488 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2210 mm |