1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (148 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 448 kg more than 1967 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 1967 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Ranger | 1500 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 257 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2430 mm |