1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1969 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1995 Ford Ranger. (159 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 290 kg more than 1969 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 1969 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Mustang |
Year Released | 1995 | 1969 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 4731 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 159 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2750 mm |