1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Ranger | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Ranger | 140 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2620 mm |
