1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1980 Skoda L
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1980 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1980 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 603 kg more than 1980 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Ranger | 1980 Skoda L | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | Ranger | L |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2410 mm |
