1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (159 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 685 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (305 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Ranger | 102 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 159 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2160 mm |