1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Holden Commodore

To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Commodore (171 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1995 Ford Ranger. (159 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 60 kg more than 1992 Holden Commodore.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (305 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Commodore. (288 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Commodore.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Ford Ranger 1992 Holden Commodore
Make Ford Holden
Model Ranger Commodore
Year Released 1995 1992
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4014 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 159 HP 171 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 288 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1455 kg 1395 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1650 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2740 mm