1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Volvo 480
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 480. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 480 would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 480, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 1992 Volvo 480 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | 480 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2510 mm |