1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1997 Mazda MPV
To start off, 1997 Mazda MPV is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1997 Mazda MPV. (146 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda MPV weights approximately 294 kg more than 1995 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda MPV. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 1997 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | MPV |
Year Released | 1995 | 1997 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 2954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 1722 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2850 mm |