1995 Ford Ranger vs. 1998 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1998 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1995 Ford Ranger. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Ranger.
Because 1995 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Oldsmobile SS (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Ranger. (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 1998 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Ranger | SS |
Year Released | 1995 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |