1995 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Holden Astra

To start off, 2002 Holden Astra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2002 Holden Astra. (120 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 278 kg more than 2002 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1995 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Astra. (165 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Astra.

Compare all specifications: