1995 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2003 Skoda Fabia is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2003 Skoda Fabia. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2003 Skoda Fabia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 298 kg more than 2003 Skoda Fabia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Skoda Fabia. (195 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Ranger | 2003 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Ranger | Fabia |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2470 mm |